You Never Know When You’re Dancing with Yourself

So, one of the many, many weird things about writing is anticipating a audience but never knowing, on any particular story, if have one. Unlike a musician, who generally knows if she is practicing or performing a gig. Or a dancer or actor who can tell if the theater is packed or empty.

Of course in the case of recorded music, TV and film, it’s more like writing. You’re making this thing for this nebulous group of consumers. Never mind about that. There is no performance in writing. One of the reasons the ‘give away the product for free and charge for performance free-content model is so horrific for writers. Some writers can be witty in real time. 

Many cant.

All this uncertainty means that in the beginning, as you endure rejection after rejection, it can be hard to know who one is writing for. Salinger’s Christ-like Fat Lady?

Writing workshops and beta readers and classes are a relief because you know you’ll get a few readers, who will talk to you about what you’ve written. Maybe tell you some part of the truth of what reading you was like. 

At first, let me tell you, this is a horrible, horrible truth. You push through this. Writing is mostly self taught and thank God bad prose seldom actually kills anyone.

Editors have no time to give you any feedback, and I shouldn’t have to explain why that is (hint: there isn’t any money in most fiction.); if you get back a sentence of critique, you’re special; if you get a few paragraphs, you should be overjoyed. But of course you’re not. 

The closer you get, in fact, the more painful rejection can feel. 

And then, after that, even if you’re selling, you’re still going to be writing stories nobody buys. For lots of reasons, not always limited to the actual content and quality of the story itself. 

Editors have to sell magazines and readers let them know what kind of stories they like, and hate, and over time, an editor gathers an understanding of what her readership likes. So, she may like your story, and it may no be right for her readership. 

The toughest thing about short genre fiction is that the brands are the magazines and chances are you will never be a brand. Once one has struck out with a story at the major print and on-line markets, chances are, nobody is ever going to read the work.

Ever.

A breakout novel career will shine a small spotlight on your shorts, (Odd image) for those novel readers who also read short stories. There aren’t many of those! In the writing about writing book Danse Macabre Stephen King explains that he makes so little money on shorts that he feels stupid writing them. He knows he should stick to novels. But he loves himself a good short story, now and then.

So you write at first, for yourself and or the Fat Lady, your idealized reader, and then you write for the editors and agents and their audiences, and then you write for the awards process, if you care about awards, and then you can write for your fans, who might buy a story collection. Or read one you give away free. But frankly probably not. Uncurated short fiction isn’t something anyone wants to read for free.

It’s like finding a nicely wrapped sandwich sitting on a park bench. No thank you.

Another strange thing about most writers is their inability to really understand when something they have loved has gone off the rails; or rather, when they’re written a story that only really works for them.

So there’s this wonderful paradox, and you really have to learn to lean into this. the story you’re writing may only be for you. What does that mean?

Well. Really it means you can write any damn thing you please. See? Glass half full. You’re welcome.

This is the agony and the joy of traditional publication. If your story gets published? It’s not entirely your fault! When a story isn’t published? Could be cosmic injustice, sure, but the editor might be saving you from yourself.

So you’ll never know when you’re dancing alone in the room with the shades drawn. Or when there’s a rapt crowd.

Presumably, though, you got into dancing because you enjoyed it. 

So you might as well dance.

It isn’t About You

Had an epiphany talking to a friend on the phone yesterday as I walked the Charles during the freakish warm weather. I’ve been struggling, about what I should be writing, and who I should be writing about, about diversity and inclusion and my identity and my relationship to my family and how to be respectful and relevant, and he interrupted and said, ‘you can’t make this about you.’

You can’t write about the process because that writing instantly becomes the process, a higher level process, and that higher level processes swallows the lower level one and supersedes it.

Isaac Asimov once listened to a lecturer talking about his works and went up afterwards and smugly informed the lecturer that he was wrong, that he hadn’t meant half the things that the lecturer had dug out of the work.

The guy said, “Why do you think that you know more about this work than I do, just because you wrote it?”

Asimov enjoyed that. Then he went home and typed another novel before dinner. 

In A Perfect Vacuum, Stanislaw Lem sidesteps this by writing excerpts of novels and then the analysis, without the agony of having to write the books themselves.  Speculative Fiction as a genre is often guilty of this, of presenting maps rather than exploring territories. 

I have enjoyed my own vivisection, I think, in part, because I haven’t been teaching, as I should be, and I have imagined that was teaching myself and others in my analysis, and not spiraling into my own mind like an infected ingrown follicle. 

Analysis, like sex and tickling, isn’t the same when done on oneself. One can argue that like tickling it is impossible to do to oneself.  Unless you’re faking it. 

And here is the thing; if you can do it, if you can remove yourself from the equation enough for your analysis to be meaningful, you should use that energy, that remove to make more work, and let others do that job for you. If your work even warrants it, which, let’s face it, isn’t for you to say. 

It isn’t about you.

Getting out of your own way, letting go of anticipated failure or success or criticism, is vital for doing any of this with heart.

Anything that wakes you up and keeps you from entering the fictive dream? You have to let go of that. 

Michael Swanwick once told me to protect my head, when I confessed to him I couldn’t write anymore, after my Clarion, and I didn’t write fiction for 18 years.

It was a great metaphor. Analyzing your own work in public is like riding a motorcycle without a helmet. It probably wont kill you immedieately. But it is so fucking stupid.

There may come a time, with beta reading and workshopping and publisher feedback, when you have to step back and do this kind of soul searching, but for gods sake, don’t write about it and never share that writing if you do. 

I found in OS Card’s writing books many things that I felt cheapened his writing and diminished my enjoyment of his work. At a time when I had begun to emerge from my culturally conditioned homophobia, I found his defense of his own jaw dropping and I never felt the same way about him again. 

When I should have thought, as the reviewer did with Asimov, that I knew more about Card’s work than he did.

Doctors don’t discuss patients. Lawyers don’t discuss clients. For good reason. 

Your WIP is a patient on a table; it’s a defendant sitting in the witness stand. There are a very few proscribed things the professionals can say without a breach of professional ethics.

None of them are interesting. 

So, this is the end of a certain kind of talk here. I’m going to save this thing for my classroom. This is inside the beltway stuff. Inside baseball. 

Thanks for listening, as always. And goodbye for now. 

How I Wish You Were Here

Why does the water alway feel so damn cold, even though it isn’t, you’ll feel perfectly warm after you’ve been in it for a few minutes?

Evolution seems to have rendered us skeptical about immersion.  Phase changes. Slipping back and forth across that aquatic boundary layer. Piercing the surface tension. 

But oh, when you adjust, and your stupid skin stops shrieking, you are weightless and free and your nose does seem to be evolved for this space, nostrils pointed away from the flow as you pull your way through the water. 

So this is just a quick note to let those who care about such things know that I am under water again, in the secondary creation after a few months shying away from that first blast of cold, mourning the end of the last project, in that time between when one wonders if one will ever do this thing again. 

And finally you let yourself dive in, and finally you realize you’ll be swimming to the day you die, and how did you forget, that you are weightless here? How did you forget, that the water grows warm and your muscles loosen up and your sinuses get weirdly clear, and the sun on your back when you emerge feels wonderful?

Oh, I am having a lovely time, I wish you were here, and maybe you will be after the few weeks of work, followed by the one to twelve months of marketing, followed by the months to publication and distribution. Say a year or two.

Meanwhile last years output slowly winds through the system. Hope you get to see some more of that, too.

But you’re the greek chorus really. 

Though I wouldn’t dream of doing this without you, either.

I know those statements are oddly paired. 

But it’s the truth. 

The Job Inside Your Head

So the job inside your head isn’t really a job job, because it doesn’t pay enough, at least, not at first and oftentimes not ever. 

But it isn’t a hobby.

Why isn’t it a hobby? Well, for one thing the word hobby is insulting, a word invented by capitalism to make fun of activity it has difficulty monetizing.

The job inside your head is harder than a hobby, oftentimes impossible to quit, but infinitely easier to avoid for long blocks of time. 

The job inside your head drags everything into a big barn labelled ‘raw material,’ and then doesn’t know how to file any of it. As you age the barn fills with old magazines, broken typewriters, antique furniture, dead media, floppy disks and analog tape and zip drives and stacks of vinyl warping in the mildewed air. And box after box after box of unlabeled, uncategorized snapshots. 

The job inside your head is a welcome relief from your job anywhere else. The job can also be nerve wracking. It’s easiest when you pretend that you’re really, really good at it. But you never get any better when you think that way too much.

And when you never get any better, what starts in your head mostly stays in your head. 

Because the goal of the job inside your head is to make things that make the difficult and dangerous journey into other heads. And having penetrated that quarter inch of bone and skin and membrane, like Trojan horses or IEDs or Vaccines or Opioids, your head-made-thing detonates. Blooming into stuff that matters. Stuff that gets dragged into the barns inside those other heads. Tucked into a section that isn’t for raw materials but is instead loosely regarded as inspiration.

Or joy. Pure joy. 

So let us leave the here and now and go to work, or forget to work and just be in that place for a time where the work piles up undone, just mist, ghosts and shadows and briefly glimpsed vistas  of glittering starscapes, sweat slicked gleaming bodies, expanding spheres of quiet destruction, mushroom clouds and armies marching over shattered obsidian. 

Rebels languishing in caves of methane ice. Silent generation ships shepherded by orbs of crystalline computronium dreaming incomprehensible dreams. Chosen Ones and Everyman. Men. Persons. 

Tigerfaced Gully Foyle scattering capsules of anarchy across all spacetime. 

The black hole lurking behind nebula at the center of the Galaxy, devouring all things.

The Instrumentality punishing Command Suzdal with eternity in Shayol.

The velvet black sky full of whispering stars.  

Dark interdimensional spiders aghast at the race that would rule the sevagram!

A pulp magazine. A light saber. A rubber mask. One ring. 

A particle beam handgun with a worn ivory handle. 

Pack them in your briefcase. Finish that cup of coffee!

Time to get to work. 

The Toys your Parents Never bought You

The metal molds that came with the toy Creepie Crawlies, a searing hot, plastic bug spawning foundry toy from the sixties that I coveted dearly.

In the immersive, wrap-around staging of the play Natasha, Pierre and the Great Comet of 1812, a truncated War and Peace sings all around you, while at the middle, in a little alcove, a middle-aged Tolstoy sits and watches and scribbles in a notebook.

He’s the writer, at the center of life, an omniscient perspective, old enough to fear death and decline, but young enough to remember passion and primary colors.

Not one thing or the other; barely in the story, there for a moment to witness, understand, forgive, pity and envy the characters swirling around him.

So you’re the writer; you have at best as many conscious years ahead as behind, and the milestones ahead are greasy with despair. With the occasional hopeful beacon. A grandchild? Some professional accomplishment, perhaps? 

Time to get writing, friend.

So you grow up and grow older and one day you find yourself wanting to buy all the toys your parents never bought you. Read the books and do the things and visit the places and eat the food and drink the drinks that were passed over, discouraged, forbidden or forgotten. 

Sexual  maturity is one of the first of these toys you take for yourself (God, if you’re lucky) and eventually autonomy of every kind. To eat and drink and drug and work and sleep the way you see fit.

But the toys you were never given, you can never get… those toys were needed by a version of you that isn’t any more. Buying them now doesn’t work. If anything it excites that nameless ache. The sense of something missing which is perhaps the essence of life.

Still. People do it. They can’t help it. They seek these things out. They threw them out, or their mother did, with or without permission or they never had them but a neighbor did, a friend did, a person they secretly loved had the entire set, you had one, too, for a week but then your brother broke it.

And it was never replaced.

I grew up in the age of Television, Movies, Radio and print. And print was full of these mosaics of tiny ads, mostly horrific frauds of one sort or another (x-ray specs; one dollar submarines.) But some were just things that hadn’t shown up in your toy store, or they were old toys that had been discontinued. 

I came of age in the time of the monster on the cover trying to get it on with the hot woman…  Um. In our defense we didn’t make these covers. We just looked at them. For hours and hours and hours. And as little kids had no idea what was going on. 

Famous Monsters issues hung around for decades in pleasantly moldering stacks in the bargain basements of bookstores, sometimes with covers half torn off, and they were filled with tiny grids packed with strange objects of desire.

I did own the Forgotten Prisoner…

Grotesque adventure? What? Vampire Women? What the hell is going on with these things? I never saw them…
The black and white Universal Horror movies were the first monsters we knew and loved. I had this Frankenstein model, which came with glow in the dark optional head and hands. I never painted these but used the glow in the dark components and would charge them up in bright sunlight and then lock myself in the closet to watch them radiate. A soft, nacreous sickly green you grew used to. Every glow in the dark thing was the exact same color. 

Lost in Space was poorly syndicated in central New York in the sixties and seventies, and my unmet desire to see the show manifested in daydreaming about the these three models; the saucer shaped Jupter 2, Television’s knock off of Robbie the Robot from Forbidden planet called imaginatively, Robot, and the Chariot, a treaded fishbowl that for some reason excited me tremendously.

I never owned any of these.

But sooner or later, the toys and the TV shows and the movies and the ads lead you down a path to the end of childhood, which, if you were born in the sixties looked something like this:


Vampirella lurked at Childhood’s End clad in an impossible crimson bikini kind of thing, with fangs dripping blood staring into your soul with some impossible to decipher emotion.

Sometimes threatening, sometimes being threatened.

The Warren Publication, including EERIE and CREEPY were big, not sold on the comics racks but with the full-sized magazines, and they had black and white interiors. 

I have no memory of any Vampirella story. But she looms large in that landscape, gazing through that pre-adolescent haze of inchoate lust.

Frank Frazetta’s women were the end of the road. You could still look back, at the candy colored super heroes printed on the giveaway fast food cups, at the legos and action figures and wacky pack sticker encrusted doorway, but… the way ahead beckoned.

Cemetery forts with pony kegs and crimson lipped girls from alien high-schools smoking cigarettes in darkened basements blasting with Led Zeppelin.

Beyond lay the sexist-you’re-soaking-in-it kaliedoscope of Playboy magazine and National Lampoon and late night R-rated soft core and the long hard slog of adolescence. Eventually leaving your toys behind in your parents basement, shedding childhood as if it were some embarassing cocoon as you escaped suburbia and plunged into university or city or apartment or job.

Until finally, like Tolstoy, your own children now fleeing, you remember the acrid tang of annealing plastic, the blackened steel birthing creepy crawlies, the monotone of the Robot, the flashing saucer slicing the sky, the monsters hands and face glowing greenly in the dark, and this crazy hot goth girl that just might eat you alive.

If you lived long enough.

If you could be so lucky.

How I Escaped Fighting About the Hats Online

Excellent piece in the New Yorker about the non-event, and to those of us addicted to our feeds, I don’t have to even identify the non-event, but I’ll just say it involves hats. Screenshot excerpt follows:

***

In the old days, there was a little meme, from before we called them memes, that wars start when politicians lie to journalists and then believe what they read in the newspapers. 

This seems to more or less completely explain the botched Iraq War 2, or as I call it, the Pre-emptive Unilateral War-of-choice based on Cooked Intel that Created ISIS and Cost More than our Total Debt to China.

I used to say based on lies, but lie is a loaded word, it doesn’t really mean what it means, because it encompasses intent and a kind of self-knowledge that many liars lack.

But it doesn’t exactly explain where we are now. Where genuine grassroots outrage is indistinguishable from viral content created by provocateurs, both foreign and domestic.

But shrieking horrible loathsome men caught up, 99% of the time justly, in the gnashing gears of #metoo have a point. We have created a machine that makes mobs. A kind of destabilizing echo-chamber without gatekeepers. 

Progressive have no problem seeing the Mob in gamergate. Our mob is much much better than their mob, I think.

But it’s a mob.

Now the gatekeepers gave us a corrupt status quo, whitewashing racism, sexism, colonialism, all the isms, and all the phobias, homo/trans and xeno. Or, rather the Gatekeepers were part of a status quo that had a degree of corruption in it, and that seemed oblivious to a lot of human misery.

But one has to ask oneself, standing in the ruins of the twitter-fed Arab spring, in the wake of the Trump win, what are the pros and cons of Mobs, and what the hell do we do about the genie we have released from this bottle?

I know how reactionary this all sounds. But know this. I was a techno-utopian, once. I was a cheerleader for the inter-webs.

The far left in America, for a time, believed that the news of Stalin’s purges were fake news by a corporate media in thrall to capitalist imperialism. Regardless of the thrall thing, they were wrong. The purges were real. At some point, some of the left woke up and realized, no, the purges were real, and that while the critique of capitalism made by Marxism had a lot of merit, its prescriptions for Utopia were a complete and total fucking disaster. 

This is where I am now with networked technology, information that wants to be free, ‘free’ tools and technologies, digital anonymity— the whole Whole Earth Review Kevin Kelly slash Cyberpunk / Cypherpunk Randian venn overlap of techno utopianism.

Stain’s purges were real. Trump is real. A none-of-the-above social media revolution empowers the biggest organized monster lurking in the shadows.

Which brings us back to the title, and how I escaped Hatgate. (Hategate?) I stopped using the liking and sharing buttons, in the week before Covington. Instead, I wrote a few comments. I sat with choking outrage at the smirk, worrying at some level… that  maybe I was being cynically manipulated, because I have been manipulated in this way before. 

I wonder now, if writing a comment is like eating a piece of fruit, and if liking and sharing is like drinking sweetened fruit juice, which is fine for some people but a road to obesity and diabetic problems for others. All the white flours which some people tolerate, and which make other people sick.

If you don’t care enough about something to actually talk about it? With words? What the fuck are you really doing by sharing it, and liking it… and maybe not even reading it?

You’re memeing. You’re gossiping. You’re agitating. You’re echochambering. You’re inciting. Like and share is the core of the feedback loop of virality.

Hey what do you call a living thing that grows super super fast, hijacking all available resources, and growing without care for the environment supporting it?

That’s a tumor. That’s cancer.

Like and Share is a tumor machine.

I’m stopping it for now. Or being super judicious (he says) as in linking to the article about non-events above. (he then goes back and reads every word of the article) If I ‘heart’ something I’ll say so with words. If I want to share something, I’m gonna sever the link to the original and embed it in a post I write, that ads some new angle and credits the original authors… let them google up the damn link. Otherwise, people can find the news item… through their own interests.

Maybe even through, gasp, a gatekeeper. 

I’m giving up my part time job as a viral agent, and I realize, in so doing, I forfeit my right to become viralized. 

Without viralizing, any following I have will grow slowly. Word of mouth that is actually words, and not button presses. Apples instead of applejuice.

I was saved from Covington because I didn’t share it, I was never an agent for whatever created it, and I didn’t distract people from anything real by talking about it, except in this broader context, of saying we have to stop talking about pure outrage fed to us by the outrage machine. 

One partial fix, which of course is gameable, is the downvote, which twitter and FB lack. Another excerpt:

***

With the downvote, instead of doubling down on Covington, or parsing it, and talking about it, and feeding it, one could, after getting more context, downvote it.

Downvoting the non-event would be a way of voting for none-of-the-above that isn’t abdicating the slippery moral imperative to vote for the lesser of two evils. 

You got scammed by the outrage machine? Fuck that. Downvote is the button we need. All publicity is good publicity? And you tricked me into giving it to you?

Let me knock that bullshit back down to size.

This cranky man resisted click-bait outrage. You won’t believe what happened next!

The Intoxicating Jolt of Now

Doing research for this I discovered the origin for William Burroughs Naked Lunch Monsters. Maybe. Wikipedia doesn’t think so…
Remember language is a virus.

Those little red circles with the numbers in them, that top out at 99 on the iphone, but soar upward unbound everywhere else.

How many people have read me, hearted me, shared me, linked to me?

The graphs at the on-line etailers. I just sold five books! I haven’t sold a book in two days!

Your sales rank graph at Amazon, KDP. Your KENP page reads.

The progress of readers at Goodreads. Ten people have added my book. I can see what page some of them are on. I can check each and every review.

The control panels, where you can track your trend lines. 

Your twitter followers, your retweets, your FB friends, your Youtube subscribers and views, your mailing list sign-ups… and drops. 

Your award nods slowly accumulating at the SFWA site. (if you do SFWA) If you get nods. 

“Sure, the world of the future is like a swarm of angry bees living in your head… but there they are,” said Firesign Theater a long damn time ago. 

This week I successfully avoided talking about the hats, a reference that may or may not be decodable in the future, assuming there is a future, which seems mostly safe to assume. But not entirely. 

I didn’t share the Hat thing, so I didn’t have to apologize about sharing the hat thing or double down on the hat thing or drill into the hat thing to find the deeper truth of the hat thing. 

Instead I read my feed without liking, or sharing but occasionally commenting in others threads, congrats and condolences. Brief engagements that spurted way too many words into someone elses comment thread.

A friend asked me to not derail the point of her tweet with a long orthogonal rambling and I deleted my posts and she said she’d be sure not to waste time commenting on my comments again. 

Ouch. And mission accomplished, I guess. Unintentional of course, the way I do most things.

  • There’s no way to interact with the feed that doesn’t entrance you. 
  • The feed is designed to entrance you.
  • This entrancement is designed to sell things to you. 
  • It is designed to prevent you from selling things to your ‘friends’ —unless you pay for ads.
  • Your feed is not a publicly regulated utility. It may be entirely composed of lies. If you choose to fill your head with lies and rage, your feed will feed that to you in auto-amplifying waves until you are ready to second amendment whoever it is you are mad at.
  • Your feed’s author and owners, when warned that their platform were being weaponized, shrugged and said, “that isn’t our responsibility.” 
  • Your feed is a nineteenth century vitamin elixir chock full of opium before the Harrison Act.
  • Your feed is a radium cocktail toasting the new millennium.
  • Your feed is a Shoe-fitting fluoroscope spewing hard x-rays in all directions.
  • Your feed is a glowing watch dial painted by radium girls –taught to twirl the brushes in their mouths to get a sharper point. 
  • Your feed is energy  too cheap to meter.
  • Your feed is free… but TANSTAAFL.
  • What else do billionaires give you, specifically you, for free? I’m not talking libraries built by governments. I’m not talking about soup kitchens or food stamps. Billionaires. Giving. You. Stuff. For. Free.
  • Nothing. Nothing else. Ask yourself. Why do I get this for free?
  • Your net search is free, too. Shiver.
  • TV was free… but the broadcast spectrum was limited. TV was like drinking a six pack a night. Not good for you. But endurable. 
  • Your feed is infinitely large. It scrolls for ever. It is a billion billion channels.
  • South American native people chewed coca leaves for centuries with harmful effects similar to coffee. Until the leaves were concentrated into powders and the boiled into crack. Becoming more and more concentrated.
  • The info billionaires are using deep learning and research and all the shiny tools they have from the whole billionaire thing to concentrate your feed and make it ever more entrancing. 
  • You are the product. You make the product. You are the employee. You are the market.
  • You work in a company store and every interaction makes money for the store owner. 
  • You are addicted to the adrenaline jolt of Now. I’m doing it to you now, too. The irony isn’t lost on me. We’re falling off this cliff together. Have we reached terminal velocity yet?
  • When will we hit bottom?

But my blog is a backwater, a church basement and a ring of folding chairs. At best I hope to grow into a grainy, hissing channel 2 with PBS and reruns of Monty Python, new to you perhaps. 

We’re all mad as hell. But are we going to take it anymore?

Pull up a chair, introduce yourself, and smoke ’em if you got em. 

Social Media Unleashes Monsters from The ID

The gaunt middle aged man tosses his  smoldering cigarette butt to the floor and twists it out with a sneaker that has seen better days. Looks up at the circle of people sitting in their folding chairs and winces, realizing this was rude. He should have asked for an ash tray.

Really he shouldn’t have been smoking until the first break. 

It’s his turn to share.

The man clears his throat. “After a million years of shining sanity, they could have hardly understood what power was destroying them.”

He looks around the circle and sighs at the blank stares. He’s the oldest one in the circle.

“Monsters from the id. An old movie. The movie that became Star Trek? Sort of? You know about Star Trek? But you never watched Forbidden Planet…”

The man takes out another cigarette but doesn’t light it, only stares at the unlit tip.

“The movie is based on The Tempest, but the part I’m talking about isn’t in the Tempest. It’s new to the film. Something gained in translation—”

The  man is interrupted by a sigh of comprehension from across the circle. “Invisible monsters. That robot that was in all those Twilight Zone episodes! Um,” the woman in her thirties looks at the man, skepticism and compassion at war on her face. 

The man nods. “The monsters that destroyed the Krell, the alien species on that planet, were unleashed by  tech which set free the darkest impulses of the subconscious. The monsters were thought into being.

“Oh. So you’re talking about the internet? Social media.”

The man smiles. “I worked in the first tech bubble. I was a believer. I laughed at luddites! A world without gatekeepers would be a better world. A new anarchic, meritocratic, democratic commons. A new marketplace of ideas! A wave of intelligence and compassion lifting all boats. A new golden age…”

The man lights his cigarette and takes a long, deep drag, and closes his eyes. The smoke streams through his nostrils as he smiles. 

His eyes fly open and the circle of faces around him flinches as one.

“Guilty! Guilty! My evil self is at that door, and I have no power to stop it! Stop! No further! I deny you! I give you up!”

An awkward silence falls. Someones phone set to mute wriggles in their back pocket, making the metal folding chair buzz.

The thirty something woman smiles as she breaks the awkward silence. “Dude. Relax. You were in marketing in the first tech bubble. Genies out of the bottle anyway. The question is what do we do now?”

The man lowers his cigarette. “I’m out of ideas.”

A smile at that. “We can tell. Why don’t you listen instead of talking, for awhile?”

The mans nostrils flare. “Okay,” he says, after a painful beat.

He drops his cigarette next to the first one and puts it out with a sigh.




The Real Lesson of this Teachable Moment is to Free Ourselves from Social Media

You have been manipulated. By some of the richest people on Earth.

They built a playhouse for you, full of useful toys. Free to use! With calendars and walls to place your posters and shared photo albums and little magical locked drawers so you could collect money for good causes and they managed it all with a little magical creature that took all this info–much more than you could handle, from the hundreds and thousands of friends this system found for you.

The magical creature sorted out how important it thought each scrap of paper on the bulletin board was. And it turned that stuff into a scrolling sheet of paper it typed up—just for you! Your feed! And it watched you laugh or smile or cry, as you read your feed, and it kept track of that, too.

For inside the little creature was an infinitely large storehouse of index cards. It remembered everything! And it had an infinite amount of time to ponder the cards, while it sat and brooded, its pretty sculpted face stripped away to reveal a coldly gleaming clockwork of diamond gears and pistons.

The creature conferred with the billionaire and his army of clerks and bankers and lawyers.

Oh, what nice billionaires we have, to make such a thing for us we all thought. 

For a time. 

When the fun house seemed to be soaking up all our time, and making us feel weird and somtimes bad we were told, well, use it responsibly!

There are third party tools you can buy!

You could pay for a gnome to haul you out of the fun house, or to guide you away from the funhouse at certain times, but the gnomes sometimes were blocked by new magic created by the funhouse and the problem was, since you hired the gnomes, you could always just stop paying them and wind up back in the funhouse.

Surely, many of us began to think to ourselves, the funhouse isn’t really a drug. It isn’t really addictive, like heroin or anything. That’s just a metaphor. Right? Right?

I’m not sure anymore. Like the AA people sitting around smoking cigarettes, taking one sometimes lethal drug while trying to avoid a more lethal one, I’m sitting round in the abandoned church basement of my blog with a few friends. My actual friends. A  handful of people.

Which is maybe as many friends as we need or should ever have. 

Are You Processing or Procrastinating?

How Does a Writer Know if they are Processing or Procrastinating?

Well, pretty much they don’t.

Wait! Stop! Don’t leave! Let’s roll around in this and see if there’s anything worth taking away from the question.

Pay by the word, or word count (which I claim to have renounced) as a milestone is one way for a writer to figure out if they’re really actually writing enough or not.

When you’re paid by the word and writing is your job, you have capitalism telling you what to focus on. And Capitalism is loud. Maybe you get a dollar a word writing advertorial content, an hourly rate or salaried rate as a tech writer, or you make one to ten cents a word writing fiction and you do all three.

Check to see if you are still living indoors / have access to healthcare and adjust your focus accordingly. (Don’t go by if you’re starving because it’s hard to starve in the west.)

But what about aspiring writers? First of all there is no such thing—there are writers who aspire to be to be read more widely, or published but all writers who are actually writing are writers.

So what about those people?

Well.  How much and how fast do you have to be writing to be really writing.

Hemingway’s rate was around 500 words a day. That’s a novel or so of some length a year depending on how many days you spend dead drunk. Back in the olden times, that more or less meant you were a writer, but you wrote in longhand in mastodon blood or with a coal powered typewriter and the editing process was kinda excruciating and doing research was way hard. So that’s part of the old time slowness.

Stephen King supposedly writes 2k a day which is two big fat novels a year or one superfat one. Again, depending on weekends, vacations, and how much time you spend on social media yelling at the president.

A thousand is given as a kind of average number for Really Being A Writer but the million word a year pulp writer rate is 3000 plus words a day, on average, for 333.3 days or so. (Math!)

But this is complicated when Writers you Like and Respect say things like “I wrote that novel in four days,” or “I had the idea for this story during the Nixon administration and then wrote it off and on for fifty years while I worked as an editor for lug-nut monthly.”

Which brings us back to your process, your subconscious, and the universal human desire to slack off and pretend to do something rather than actually fucking do it. 

Your process may well require background work in the subconscious. Time to ruminate. Time to ponder. Time to stare into the sky and think about eating more than you should. Time for inadvisable, elaborately imagined fully-staged sexual yearnings. Time to worry about things you said at parties that you suspect you shouldn’t have. Time to worry if your social media presence is helping you, or if its millstone around your neck.

Um.

Time to process. 

Before you feel good about this thought, you should know that maybe all you need, really, is to sleep regularly and well.

I knew a writer who asked himself five open ended questions about his work in progress each night before he went to sleep and while he never had any answers in his dreams he noticed that after he had done this his work flowed more easily. So he still does it.

So while you may never know when a lull in output is refilling the tank, and when it is being worthless and weak, I have found you can almost always do one of the following.  Or rather, I can.

  1. Write crappy first drafts.
  2. Write to writing prompts and
  3. Work on pure craft without worrying about content or
  4. Edit stuff that you know you need to edit but the thought fills you with dread
  5. Read something you know you should but haven’t had the energy to read. (Something higher up on the literary / intellectual food chain than your output.)
  6. Be doing something super cool so outside your comfort zone that you’d rather be writing

if you think you are procrastinating, you definitely are. If you worry if you might be procrastinating but aren’t sure, do the list above. If you’re pretty sure you’re not procrastinating… try editing less and writing more first draft material until your ‘to be edited’ pile induces nausea. Because if a lull in output comes, you’ll have plenty of number four to do.

If my process ideas seem dumb to you, congratulations, because in the end, you have to do you, and make the process that works for you. This process will ideally be somewhere between:

  • Smugly knowing that every minute you are not writing was really necessary. So the one book every ten years is awesome.
  • Hating  yourself for every minute you are not spewing one thousand words an hour. Letting that hate make you quit.

As my wife said, moderation in all things, to which I replied, “wait–isn’t that too much moderation?”

She sighs.

“Can one be immoderately moderate?”

“I have to go work now.”

Picture my wife pondering her unpaid emotional labor before leaving for her mile long walk to work.

Picture me bleary eyed staring at my giant imac on my improvised standing desk. That means our dresser. Writing new words or doing 1-4. Trying to avoid the unpleasant extremes I mention.

I’m fifty six with a dozen or so professionally published short stories. 

I can sleep when I’m dead. No. I really should sleep regularly and well. 

But I have to stop procrastinating.